The typical L&D stack is built around content delivery. An LMS manages course assignments. An LXP surfaces personalized recommendations. Assessment tools measure whether employees absorbed what they read or watched.

This infrastructure does its job. But every piece of it shares the same limitation: it's built for information transfer, not skill development. Watching a module on how to give difficult feedback is not the same as practicing it. Reading a framework for handling objections is not the same as navigating a real conversation under pressure.

The skills that drive performance — communication, feedback, leadership, negotiation — require repeated practice. Most L&D stacks offer almost none of it.

‍

What AI Roleplay Actually Does

AI roleplay addresses the part of skill development that content delivery can't: the practice. It creates structured, on-demand environments where employees engage in realistic simulated conversations and receive immediate, personalized feedback on both what they said and how they said it.

Studies across management training, sales, and professional development show meaningful gains in communication skills, confidence, and on-the-job application:

• Graduate students using AI as a simulated "difficult employee" reported skill growth and greater confidence handling tough conversations (Holzweiss & Conrey, 2025).
• Managers valued low-risk practice for challenging dialogues, citing reduced anxiety and improved preparedness (Wilhelm et al., 2025).
• AI-supported role-play models significantly improved speaking skills and interaction mindset compared with control groups (Darmawansah et al., 2025).

AI roleplay delivers the most value for skills that require repetition to develop: feedback conversations, objection handling, expectation-setting, leadership transitions. If the skill involves navigating a real human interaction under pressure, structured practice is how it gets built.

‍

What Makes It Work

AI roleplay works when it's implemented correctly. Four principles from the research separate programs that change behavior from those that get completed once and forgotten.

Start with real performance gaps. Scenarios should be built around the actual conversations employees struggle with, not around what the tool can do. Needs analysis and performance data should drive design (Shamim et al., 2025).

Build a curriculum, not a one-off exercise. Single sessions produce limited results. A structured progression with clear objectives, increasing difficulty, and reflection is what drives transfer to real-world performance (John & Sarvankar, 2025).

Keep humans in the loop. AI practice works best alongside human coaching, not instead of it. Manager debriefs and trainer reviews add the contextual guidance AI feedback can't provide (Alabdouli, 2025).

Measure behavior, not completions. Completion rates tell you nothing about whether anything changed. Track engagement, self-reported confidence, and on-the-job performance metrics (Shamim et al., 2025).

‍

In Practice: Scaling Manager Development

A $5B financial services firm needed to scale manager development with a small HR team. Building a program from scratch wasn't feasible. They needed something that would produce real behavior change. The firm deployed AI-powered scenarios focused on two high-stakes skills: giving feedback and setting expectations.

Within weeks of rollout:

• 94% of participants felt more prepared to handle similar situations
• 91% felt they could directly apply what they learned

Participant feedback reflected specific behavior changes: more deliberate communication approaches, clearer goal-setting frameworks, greater self-awareness about their own style. The results tracked closely with what the research predicts when programs are grounded in real skill gaps, structured as a curriculum, and oriented around practical application.

‍

Integrating Without Disrupting

The most effective implementations use AI roleplay as a practice layer alongside existing content delivery tools. Employees consume relevant content, then apply that knowledge in structured simulations. Managers review results, identify patterns, and build coaching conversations around what surfaces.

Most organizations already have the content infrastructure they need. What they're missing is the practice layer, and adding it doesn't require rebuilding anything.

Colleva's Learning & Development solutions are designed to fit into the stack you already have.

‍

Citations

Alabdouli, H. (2025). The Role and Impact of Learning and Development (LD) Programs, with a Focus on AI Integration. Journal of Human Resource and Leadership. https://doi.org/10.47604/jhrl.3321

Darmawansah, D., Hwang, G., Lin, C., & Febiyani, F. (2025). An artificial intelligence-supported GFCA learning model to enhance L2 students' role-play performance, English speaking and interaction mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73, 1451–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10453-6

Holzweiss, P., & Conrey, M. (2025). "A Surprisingly Helpful Tool": Using AI Role-Play to Build Supervision Skills. Student Affairs on Campus. https://doi.org/10.54155/saoc.v8.i1.06

John, A., & Sarvankar, T. (2025). SmartSim: A Curriculum-Centric Conversational Agent for Employee Training. The American Journal of Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/volume07issue10-05

Shamim, F., Swati, S., Afzal, M., Sherazi, S., & Kazmi, S. (2025). Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Employees Training and Development. Research Journal for Social Affairs. https://doi.org/10.71317/rjsa.003.05.0395

Wilhelm, L., Ding, X., Knutsen, K., Carik, B., & Rho, E. (2025). How Managers Perceive AI-Assisted Conversational Training for Workplace Communication. Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1145/3719160.3736639